How Pride Went Global—and Got Hijacked by Corporations
From Johannesburg to Berlin, Pride has gone global—but at what cost?
The rainbow capitalism booth sat exactly where the police barricades used to be.
I stood there, Diet Coke sweating in my hand, watching a Fortune 500 company hand out branded fans to queers wilting in the June heat. The irony tasted metallic. This same corner—I'd checked the old protest photos—was where cops had corralled marchers in '73, where blood had mixed with glitter on asphalt. Now it hosted a corporate photo booth where you could overlay rainbow filters on your selfies.
"Get your free Pride swag!" chirped a brand ambassador whose pronoun pin looked fresh from its packaging. Behind her, a banner proclaimed the company's "unwavering commitment to LGBTQ+ equality." The same company that, I'd learned from a quick Google search that morning, donated to politicians voting against our healthcare rights.
Something clenched in my chest—not quite rage, not quite grief. More like the disorientation of finding your childhood home converted into an Airbnb. Everything looked the same but felt hollow, sanitized for mass consumption.
When We Marched Without Permission
My first Pride was in Cape Town, 2007. Not the glossy, tourist-friendly version you see in travel blogs now, but something rawer, more necessary.
South Africa had legalized same-sex marriage the year before—the first country in Africa, fifth in the world—but legal equality and lived reality occupied different universes. In the townships, corrective rape still claimed lesbian lives. In the suburbs, families still disowned their children. The constitution said we were equal, but the streets told a different story.
The march started in Green Point, maybe three thousand of us gathered under a February sun that felt like judgment. No corporate banners yet—those would come later. Just hand-painted signs in English, Afrikaans, Xhosa. "Ndim lo" (I am here). "Ons is ook mense" (We are also people). "My son is gay and I love him."
What struck me wasn't the celebration—it was the grief woven through everything. We carried photos of those we'd lost. Zoliswa Nkonyana, murdered at nineteen for being lesbian. David Olyn, beaten to death in Observatory. Names I'd never heard but suddenly felt responsible for remembering.
An older Coloured woman marched beside me, her sign simply reading "For my daughter Shanice." When I asked about her daughter, she pointed to one of the memorial photos. "They killed her last year. Said she was confusing God's plan." She kept marching, tears mixing with sweat, refusing to let grief stop her feet.
That was my introduction to Pride. Not as party but as persistence. Not as celebration but as collective mourning and collective defiance braided together. The weight of showing up when showing up could get you killed.
The police watched us with the particular disinterest of those who wouldn't investigate our murders but also wouldn't actively stop our march. Progress, South African style.
Halfway through, we stopped at the Methodist Church where Reverend Ecclesia conducted same-sex unions despite church doctrine. She stood on the steps, collar catching the light, and blessed us in four languages. "You are sacred," she said. "Your love is sacred. Your lives are sacred."
Behind her, counter-protesters held signs condemning us to hell. The contrast was perfect—blessing and curse occupying the same frame, like South Africa itself.
The Seduction of Safety
By 2015, everything had shifted globally. Marriage equality swept through country after country—Ireland by referendum, the US by court decision, Luxembourg with their openly gay Prime Minister leading the way. Suddenly corporations couldn't rainbow-wash their logos fast enough, from London to Sydney to São Paulo.
Friends across continents sent me photos that year. Amsterdam's canal parade—once a radical statement—now featured ING Bank's massive orange boat. Berlin's Christopher Street Day, born from radical resistance, showcased Deutsche Bank floats. A friend from London wrote: "Barclays threw a bigger Pride party than any queer organization could afford. The same Barclays that wouldn't give us business loans in the '90s."
I dove into research, scrolling through social media posts from Pride events worldwide. The patterns were eerily consistent: H&M selling Pride collections made in countries where being gay meant prison. BMW painting rainbow cars while their foundation donated to conservative politicians. Vodafone celebrating love while operating in 70 countries where homosexuality remained illegal.
Part of me felt seduced even from a distance. After years of fighting for crumbs of acceptance, seeing major brands court our community felt intoxicating. Look at us now, I thought, watching Instagram stories of elaborate corporate Pride activations from Stockholm to São Paulo. From protests to parades. From demanding rights to being a demographic.
The seduction was real. Corporate sponsorship meant permits granted without question, professional sound systems instead of borrowed speakers that cut out mid-speech, actual security instead of hoping the cops didn't turn on us.
But something gnawed at me as I watched these sanitized celebrations online. The same creeping discomfort I'd felt when a straight colleague asked if I was "one of those political gays or just normal."
In therapy sessions, I see the quiet cost of this dissonance—clients torn between relief at being included and shame at feeling like they should be grateful for crumbs. One man described scrolling through corporate Pride posts while simultaneously hiding his boyfriend from his LinkedIn profile, the contradiction eating him alive.
This sanitized version of Pride—scrubbed clean for sponsor comfort—wasn't just addition. It was also subtraction. Each rainbow logo seemed to erase a little more of our history. Each corporate float pushed out grassroots organizers who couldn't compete with marketing budgets. Each "Love Wins" slogan simplified our struggles into Instagram-worthy soundbites.
The Price of Admission
Here's what rainbow capitalism doesn't want us to examine: the price we pay for their acceptance.
It starts subtly. Guidelines about "family-friendly" Pride events that effectively ban leather communities and radical drag queens who built movements from Berlin to San Francisco. Parade applications that favor corporate sponsors over activist groups. Vendor fees that exclude small queer-owned businesses while welcoming multinationals that fund our oppression with their other hand.
A friend involved in Pride organizing in Barcelona told me how she watched this transformation happen. What began as grassroots organizing gradually became corporate negotiation. Every decision, she said, started filtering through the lens of sponsor comfort. Would this speaker make Santander Bank nervous? Could they move the trans rights booth further from the main stage? Maybe tone down the anti-capitalism messaging?
"The committee kept saying 'We need their money,'" she told me, voice bitter with memory. "As if corporate cash was oxygen and we'd suffocate without it. As if movements across Europe hadn't survived—and thrived—for decades on community funding and righteous anger."
The breaking point came when an elder who'd been part of the original Pride movements in the '70s apparently erupted during a meeting. "We didn't fight police in London and Paris and Amsterdam so we could beg for approval from the same institutions that wanted us dead," they'd said. Half the committee had never heard their name, didn't know their history, didn't understand the weight of their words.
She left the committee after that. "I couldn't watch us auction off our history to the highest bidder anymore."
That's the insidious part—how corporate Pride erases our elders, our history, our radical roots. It repackages our resistance as a party, our demands for justice as requests for tolerance, our rage as rainbows.
Manufacturing Consent Through Comfort
The most effective oppression doesn't look like oppression. It looks like inclusion—but only the right kind of inclusion, the profitable kind, the kind that doesn't challenge power structures or demand real change.
I saw this crystallize during 2020's "virtual Pride" celebrations. While corporations filmed elaborate rainbow campaigns, Black trans women were being murdered at record rates across continents. While brands posted #LoveWins content, queer youth homelessness skyrocketed from Toronto to Melbourne. While CEOs recorded Pride messages, their companies quietly funded politicians stripping away healthcare in Brazil, banning "LGBTQ propaganda" in Hungary, and criminalizing trans existence in the UK.
The disconnect was staggering. But what struck me most was how many in our community defended it. "At least they're supporting us," became the refrain. As if crumbs were a feast. As if visibility without liberation was enough.
This is how they manufacture our consent—through comfort that makes us forget we deserve more than tolerance, more than being a marketing demographic, more than conditional acceptance that evaporates when profit margins shrink.
A client once described it perfectly: "I feel like I'm supposed to be grateful that Primark sells Pride shirts, but all I can think about is how those same shirts are made in Bangladesh where my queer siblings face life imprisonment." The cognitive dissonance was eating him alive—this pressure to perform gratitude for acceptance that came with price tags.
The Kids Aren't Buying It
But here's where hope cracks through: the younger generation isn't buying what rainbow capitalism is selling.
I witnessed this shift at various Pride events in 2023. While corporations threw elaborate parties, young organizers from Warsaw to Mexico City staged alternative actions. "Pride is a Protest" rallies that centered those still fighting for basic rights. Marches that refused corporate sponsorship and police participation. Gatherings that looked more like the radical protests of our past than the sanitized parades of recent years.
"Your generation got marriage equality and thought the fight was over," young organizers often point out. "But we're watching our trans siblings get legislated out of existence while Adidas sells rainbow sneakers. That's not liberation."
She wasn't wrong. I felt something I couldn't name—shame, maybe. Or recognition. That I'd grown used to comfort I hadn't questioned deeply enough.
We'd gotten comfortable—some of us, anyway. Those of us who could pass, who had disposable income, who fit into the "acceptable queer" boxes that corporations could market to. We'd traded solidarity for sponsorship, collective liberation for individual inclusion.
But these young radicals—many of them trans, many of them BIPOC, many of them poor—refused to settle for performative progress. They organized outside corporate Pride, creating spaces that felt dangerous in the best way. Dangerous like truth-telling. Dangerous like demanding more than crumbs. Dangerous like our protests used to be.
The Violence of Vanilla
What we don't talk about enough is how corporate Pride commits its own form of violence—the violence of homogenization, of flattening our beautiful complexity into marketable simplicity.
Gone are the leather communities who fought police in bar raids from Hamburg to Chicago. Too scary for sponsors. Gone are the radical faeries who created alternative communities outside capitalism. Too weird for mass appeal. Gone are the sex workers who kept our community alive during the plague years. Too controversial for corporate comfort.
In their place? Sanitized versions of queerness that could star in insurance commercials. The "we're just like you" narrative that erases everything that makes us magnificently different. The respectability politics that sacrifices our most vulnerable for the comfort of our oppressors.
I felt this erasure personally when a Pride organization rejected my workshop proposal on queer sex and intimacy. "We're trying to maintain a certain image," they explained. The same organization that hung banners thanking pharmaceutical companies that price-gouge PrEP medication globally—from the NHS to American health systems to South African clinics.
This is what we lose when we let corporations set our agenda—not just funding, but our very essence. Our sexual liberation becomes "love is love" platitudes. Our gender revolution becomes pronoun pins. Our rage becomes rainbow merchandise.
Returning to Our Roots (With Interest)
But here's the thing about sanitization—it only works if we let it. And increasingly, we're not letting it.
The past few years have seen a radical reclamation of Pride's protest roots. Not just by young organizers, but by elders who remember when Pride meant risk, by middle-aged queers like me who've watched the corporate co-option with growing unease, by anyone who understands that liberation can't be sponsored by our oppressors.
These new-old Prides look different. Smaller, maybe. Angrier, definitely. More Black and brown, more trans-centered, more focused on those still fighting for survival rather than those comfortable enough to sip sponsored cocktails.
Last summer, in cities across the world, "Pride is a Protest" marches sprung up, organized entirely through Signal messages and whisper networks. No permits. No sponsors. No rainbow-draped police cars. Just hundreds gathering to march for trans lives, for sex worker rights, for HIV medication access, for the queers in Uganda and Russia and Iran where being out means death.
For those who participated, it felt like coming home. Like remembering why we march. Like honoring those who bled for our right to be visible by refusing to make that visibility comfortable for those who'd rather we disappear.
An elder was there, silver-haired but still fierce. "Feels familiar, doesn't it?" she said, grinning as we linked arms. "Like we remember who we are."
The Both/And of Liberation
Here's what I've learned through decades of watching Pride evolve, devolve, and revolve: we don't have to choose between celebration and protest. The most powerful movements hold both.
Yes, there's value in visibility, in normalization, in having one month where rainbow flags fly from buildings that once would have barred our entry. For the queer kid in rural Poland or small-town Texas, seeing corporate Pride support might be their first glimpse that they're not alone.
But we cannot let that visibility replace our vision. Cannot let corporate inclusion eclipse our demand for justice. Cannot let rainbow capitalism convince us that being marketed to equals being free.
Real Pride—the kind that honors our ancestors and protects our most vulnerable—looks like:
Centering those still fighting for basic rights, not just those comfortable enough to party
Refusing sponsorships that come with silence about ongoing oppression
Creating spaces for all our community's beautiful complexity, not just the parts deemed marketable
Remembering that celebration without liberation is just distraction
The Paradox of Progress
The cruelest part about rainbow capitalism isn't its hypocrisy—it's how it weaponizes our own progress against us. Every corporate Pride float becomes evidence that we've "won," that further activism is unnecessary, that those still fighting are just malcontents who can't appreciate how far we've come.
This narrative erases ongoing violence. Trans kids being legislated out of existence while Nike sells Pride sneakers. Queer elders dying alone while banks rainbow-wash their logos. HIV+ folks rationing medication while pharmaceutical companies sponsor Pride parties from London to Lagos.
A young organizer said something that haunts me: "They're using our victories to declare the war over while we're still counting casualties."
This is the paradox—the more visible we become, the harder it is to show what remains invisible. The more accepted some of us get, the easier it is to abandon those still deemed unacceptable. The more we're included in existing systems, the less we imagine new ones.
Beyond the Binary
Maybe the most radical thing we can do is reject the binary altogether. Not corporate Pride OR protest Pride, but a complete reimagining of what collective queer power looks like.
I dream of Pride events that don't need corporate money because we fund each other. Of celebrations that center joy AND justice. Of parades that include corporate employees marching as individuals while rejecting their employers' rainbow-washing. Of protests that dance and parties that politicize.
I dream of Pride with drumlines echoing down alleyways in Johannesburg, zines tucked into the hands of teenagers in Tokyo, drag queens blessing crowds with glitter and gospel in Madrid, not product samples. Elder queers from the movements in Amsterdam teaching protest chants to baby queers in Bangkok while sharing water bottles and stories of survival.
Some communities are already modeling this. Mutual aid networks from Athens to Buenos Aires sustaining year-round organizing. Cooperative funding that removes corporate strings. Events that refuse to separate celebration from education, party from protest, joy from justice.
Because here's what our history teaches: we've always been most powerful when we refuse their categories. When we create our own definitions. When we remember that Pride started not as a request for inclusion but as a declaration of existence.
The Work of Memory
The names slip through our fingers like water—all those who died before rainbow capitalism decided we were profitable. We carry their stories in fragments: the zines passed hand-to-hand in Berlin squats before Instagram made us palatable, the underground parties in São Paulo warehouses that doubled as organizing meetings, the chosen families in London who pooled medication when governments looked away. Memory isn't nostalgia here—it's ammunition. Because forgetting how we survived is the first step toward forgetting why we fought.
The controllers of present narratives want us amnesiacs. Want Pride's origin story to begin with corporate floats, want us grateful for visibility that costs our vision, want us to believe this crumb-feast is all we deserve. But muscle memory runs deeper than marketing. Our bodies remember the weight of silence, the cost of hiding, the price of being told our love was worth less than their comfort.
Where We Go From Here
The beautiful truth? We're already going. The reclamation has begun. Not just in metropolitan centers but in small towns where queers are organizing like our elders did—with passion over profit, community over corporate comfort, liberation over logo changes.
I see it in Belgrade's Pride that still fights for the right to march safely. In Mumbai's protests that center hijra rights over corporate comfort. In the Taipei Pride that remembers its radical roots even as it grows. In communities choosing mutual aid over corporate aid from Krakow to Nairobi.
This isn't about returning to some pure past—that past was painful, deadly for too many. It's about taking the best of our history (solidarity, radical imagination, centering the marginalized) while rejecting both corporate sanitization AND nostalgic romanticization.
What would Pride look like if we designed it for our most vulnerable rather than our most comfortable? If we measured success by lives saved rather than sponsorships secured? If we remembered that visibility without power is just performance?
The Invitation Home
To those reading this who've felt the disconnect—who've stood at corporate Pride feeling somehow both included and erased, who've wondered if this is really what our ancestors fought for, who've sensed something essential being lost in the rainbow-washing:
Your discomfort is discernment. Your unease is wisdom. Your hunger for something more real, more radical, more us—that's your spirit remembering who we are.
We don't have to accept the corporate narrative of Pride. Don't have to choose between gratitude for visibility and grief for what's been sanitized. Don't have to pretend that being marketed to equals being free.
The next time you're at Pride—corporate or grassroots—ask yourself: Who's centered here? Who's missing? What stories are being told and which are being erased? What would it look like to create spaces that honor our full complexity, our ongoing struggles, our beautiful resistance?
Because Pride isn't just about celebrating how far we've come. It's about remembering how we got here and recommitting to how far we still need to go. It's about refusing to let our resistance be repackaged as compliance, our demands diluted into requests, our revolution reduced to revenue.
The revolution will not be sponsored. But it will be ours.
Where in your life have you traded discomfort for inclusion? What part of you still longs to be seen—not sanitized, but sacred?
👉 Want more reflections like this—on queer mental health, identity, and healing?
Subscribe for weekly insights from a gay therapist, written for LGBTQ+ minds navigating a world that doesn’t always feel safe.
Or upgrade to paid and unlock deeper weekly reflections and tools.
Disclaimer:
This newsletter is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not replace therapy, diagnose, treat, or prevent any condition. For info here.